The era of the digital network is just beginning as social networks become the battle ground for the next wave of killer applications. Facebook and LinkedIn are both open platforms allowing third party developers to access their user base and provide services and applications, creating a new paradigm of personal engagement. At the same time as this new paradigm starts to solidify, the world of recruitment is facing rapid changes and all the challenges that come with change. The speed of change in recruitment has increased exponentially as the jobseeker mix moves from Gen X to Gen Y, having to adopt their different view of work, careers and personal identity.

 

The old view of one’s career was that it was synonymous with the job one had while increasingly a job is merely a stepping-stone on the path of a personal career. The jobs we perform are becoming more transient as we start to take more ownership of our own career paths. More and more of us are freelancing, consulting and working across multiple projects within and without the organisations that pay the main pay cheque. Generation Y start their professional lives already part of the digital network, already masters of their Facebook, Myspace or Bebo social profiles. This generation has already started the journey of building its own personal brand in the social context and it’s looking to do the same in a professional environment.

 

The traditional, linear recruitment process of one-to-many is on its last legs, almost broken – why? As the average time people spend in a job is near the four year mark, the economics of recruitment are having to adapt. The old process required a database of resumés to be screened, short-listed and funnelled into a pipeline of candidates based on a two-dimensional paper merit match to a three-dimensional role within a dynamic organisation. The time and money required to attract, find and hire the right candidate was high. Some estimates indicated the cost of replacing a junior accountant in a corporation ranged from £3-£10k. These economics worked while the recruiter could assume that candidates would remain in their jobs for a longer period of time. As this is rapidly changing, recruiters are looking for new ways to make the right connections to the right people faster and in a more dynamic way: from one-to-many to one-to-one. This is happening in parallel to increasing development of digital networks. The future of online recruitment is no longer about how many resumés are on tap but how quickly the right connection can be made to the right candidate for the right job.

 

One’s personal brand is rapidly becoming equally important as the corporate brand. This is evidenced by the number of people starting out on their own at an earlier age, working as consultants, freelancers or entrepreneurs. The value of one’s personal, social and professional network is growing and recruiters are being forced to adapt to capture this value. Professional networks such as LinkedIn and Xing are already reaping benefits with some companies only recruiting from these digital networks, no longer relying on traditional offline search firms or online 1.0 recruitment models such as Monster, Fish4 or Jobsite.

 

Online 1.0 recruitment still relies on the linear one-to-many model and yet their value in today’s digitally networked world lies mainly untapped: Monster announced in May that it had over 4 million resumés in the UK, that is to say they have 4 million poised jobseekers wishing to engage with the professional world. Having already established a relationship with these users, Monster is but another digital network with valuable information on users with a specific need – looking for their next step in their career development. The challenge Monster and its peers now face is to enable these users to engage with the greater professional community by allowing the owners of the 4m resumés to interact and network with each other. They will then create the channels for their users to connect directly to their potential next boss in a one-to-one way.

 

Web 2.0 as a buzz word should be at the very top of every online recruitment company’s strategic plan. Large successful online recruitment firms have the users, have built the brand and now need to marry these aspects to the available Web 2.0 technology to keep Generation Y engaged. There is an increasing number of new, innovative companies looking to leverage this new opportunity in online recruitment building new models for recruiters to engage with talent along the premise of the digital network. Zubka.com is one such example – leveraging the personal network, providing a referral payment scheme for successful hires while BraveNewTalent is looking to build a pre-employment networking site to connect talent to their potential future employers, empowering the talent to start controlling their careers through networking.

 

The role of the large job-boards is not yet extinct but given the current market situation, recruitment may be forced to reinvent itself and start to embrace Web 2.0 developments with the same fervour as our Generation Y took to the online social networks. The game is on and the rewards in recruitment remain huge but the focus needs to be on the target market – digital networking, personal brand development and innovation is the future of online recruitment. As e-recruitment was one of the first successes in online advertising, will it lead in turning the Web 2.0 buzz word into a commercial success?

Thinking about Steve Jobs’ comment that he had never seen anything like the mass of downloads and sales through the iPhone/iPod Touch app store is a real testament to the readiness of consumers to be full web/mobile 2.0 users with a simple catch: ease of use. I had thought that there needed to be some practicality or application value but that too takes a second seat according to the app store. One if the most popular downloads was a virtual Star Wars Light Sabre which did nothing but use the in-built iPhone accelerometer to make swooshing sounds. Until it was pulled by Lucas Arts, it was a massively popular application – simple but useless – and there are so many more of them!

How long until Nokia, SonyEricsson or Samsung (etc) develop their own application stores and open them to the developer community? To me T-Mobile’s announcement to open their own shows the ‘and me’ thinking here but why not? Done well the millions of non-apple phone users will have a means to pointless apps to show off at the water cooler.

If ringtones were 1.0 for mobile, surely apps are the 2.0? The holy Grail then I guess is linking apps to advertisers and turning the closed user community into a fully serviced online mobile content and commerce platform where calls just happen to also happen.

Just reading that Facebook is not only the biggest online social network, it’s the fastest growing, makes me wonder what this phenomenon is, why and what it’s bubble looks like? With my new phone I have been far more engaged with micro blogging to Twitter via the iPhone app Twinkle and think it’s all about touchy feely technology.

You know that buzzing feeling you can get when you have met up with some friends, caught up on how they are and been able to tell them all about your mad bus ride, amazing weekend and the new sofa you want? The almost physiological but definately psychological need we have for contact with our friends is wired into us. Online social apps that further enable this only go to serve this need.

Take the Facebook status function. It sits top of the news feed so when we log on via the web or indeed mobile, it’s prominently showing us who is what where and when. Being the social beings we are, we almost feel compelled to post our own wellbeing (or not as the case may be) and there is born the electric wiring of our social need to be plugged into our network.

The reason I think Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and the like are more a phenomonon and not just a fad is that they provide mini-buzz creating connections to our networks. An almost addictive habit is born, to see who responded, who is happy, sad and all along filling our need to feel connected. I think the Facebook application craze was a fad – I am no longer being asked to be a pirate best friend secret gold fish giving vamp. I am a social touchy feely techie though.

So what about that bubble… I am not sure this has a bubble to be burst but rather a situation where change will become iterative, it already is. Individual services may rise, fall or burst but the behaviour has long been here with initial versions of online blogging happening with Geocities already in ‘96/’97. Already we are able to link blogs and twitters and social networks seamlessly, connect by SMS, WAP and Web and these are really just additional channels to our network. As there was no bubble for the telephone, I think there is an interesting journey to be had with touch feely social tech.

Yahoo! an ex-darling of the web doesn’t appear to have much air left in it’s tyres with yet another announcement of a service being stopped. Yahoo had a music service and with Hollywood deal maker Terry Semel at the helm, imvested in this sector by buying music match an creating a pre-Last FM version of social music with recommendations, premium content and deals direct with the artists. It comes as a bit of a surprise though then (or does it?) to hear that a a result of their DRM service being switched off, they will not be able to support some existing users paid-for music subscriptions.

Yahoo!’s Microsoft/Icahn battle has to make one question where the real value in the company lies. It used to be the source of information with it’s initial heirarchy and then through search but as they are largely gone the brands value lies in it’s being a portal of choice mainly in the US and Asia. What caused the poster case of innovation to fall onto the slippery quicksand path?

Clayton Christensen, a professor at Harvard Business School theorised that failing companies are made to fail not by poor leadership by rather the system not allowing them to succeed. He went on to suggest that maximising shareholder returns in a tightly fought battle ground often drives companies to focus on their top products with the highest margins while the true disruption came from below within the lower margin and lower profile products.

Applying this to Yahoo! makes for an interesting thought – is it the structure of the company when faced with massive challenges from Google that forced it to focus on the wrong products, deals and sectors? Did Yahoo! miss the opportunity to really innovate and change the game because their stock price was under attack and Sue Decker was on her back foot all the time defending a failing process thus taking the focus away from what Yahoo used to to – provide innovative services to their users?

Yahoo! Mail, Finance, Shopping (in the US) and Messenger are still hugely popular services but as the embattled firm continues to look to the short-term share price, will the sum of the parts end up more valuable than the whole? If Christensen’s concept is right, it seems to me that there is little chance to break the vicious cycle and acquisition might be a bitter pill to swallow for Jerry Yang but what else is there to do?

Isn’t it just awesome when something just works and does not need recallibration from time to time? That’s what I have with my Sonos (www.sonos.com) which has all my music digitized an available at the touch of a button with the flexibility of wireless.

Now that I have moved to the iPhone from Windows, there are a few items on my wish list I would love to see in future iPhone firmware updates:

Multitasking – can we have a short and a long press home key. Short press minimizes, long press closes and double tap (rather than iPod) would show open apps to select.

Copy and Paste – I would love to be able to copy text from one application and use it in another (e.g. from a web page to a contact note)

Data over BlueTooth – I have and love my Tomtom and wish I could use my iPhone’s data connection to get the traffic updates (especially since Google Maps does not support this in the UK) and while on Tomtom, let the Tomtom read and reply to my text messages.

MMS – I am not a big user of MMS but on those occasions I do want to send a picture to a family member when I am watching that special sunset – email is not quite enough.

Hotmail access – I love that I can access my Yahoo! mail on the phone but I so wish I had my Hotmail there too. Having had a Windows mobile for a while I got so used to Hotmail and MSN messenger being built in and now have to use a Safari E-Buddy version but it’s no where the same.

Sonos controller – the iTunes remote is a very cool app but as I use my Sonos for my music it would be great to have an iPhone remote for the Sonos too.

I am sure over time I will find more and hope also these come off the list as new versions are released :)

Eight months ago I bought an HTC TyTN II and was extremely impressed it was a work horse, fast, durable and did all I wanted. Having been familiar with Windows CE/Mobile for quite some time (Since the iPaq v2 basically) I was not troubled by the clunky Windows experience, clearly I am not a Mac OS user because the only complaints I really had about the TyTN was that its battery was appalling and the phone was almost as clunky as my first ever Ericsson brick from ‘95. With my TyTN I was quite happily using what I called mobile 2.0. A few weeks ago I got to handle and test a HTC Diamond and was again reassured in my belief that Windows Mobile was a great platform with even greater developments coming out of manufacturers like HTC. I thought the Diamond was certainly a mobile 3.0 in that it has Windows in the background while having a clever skin overlaying it providing smooth iPhone-like functionality look and feel… I was determined still then that the iPhone was not for me.

Somehow that all changed… Last week something overcame me and (as is commonly the case) on a whim I asked a Carphone Warehouse sales clerk if there were any iPhones in stock… since there were, I left the shop with an 8GB version in my hands… I have gone over to the dark side. I have cancelled my HTC contract with T-Mobile (with whom I was actually very happy) and moved to O2 (a company I previously ported my number away from because their customer service was awful) to be a proud iPhone user.

So what then is Mobile 3.0? Can we have Windows and Apple on the same level? While the iPhone is a perfect phone in so many ways, it has drawbacks from a Windows familiarity POV, the fact that I cannot copy paste, cannot multitask and cannot use my iPhone for TomTom traffic and data is a real shame. The Windows Mac war has just been brought to the mobile device which to me only goes further to say that a phone today is really just another computer and the war is far from over. Obviously we need to see what happens when Google does the Android and who takes it up. Do we really want to have Google have realtime access to our calls, diary, address book and all that we do when not on a computer? To me mobile 3.0 has to be based on the usability and desirability. Never when I sat on the tube did I feel people looking over my shoulder when I was typing emails on my TyTN but now when I do anything on my iPhone I feel the envious stares of people wishing they too could be emailing, watching the latest F-Word or playing Texas Hold-Em… My iPhone lets me do all that so while it has some drawbacks I think it has to be the defining mobile 3.0 which clearly is the case since there are so many copycats out there and despite the time to develop iPhone beaters, HTC, Samsung and even Nokia have failed to think outside the box the way Apple always do. I am truly converted, only question now is: will I change to an apple powerbook when I change my laptop?